|
The first contest in 1996 was by all accounts a
convivial affair designed as a creative science experiment, which Kasparov won
easily. In retrospect, it's easy to sense overconfidence contributed to his
undoing in the '97 rematch, but few could have foreseen the extent to which the
machine was to advance in a year, or how the game would turn ugly and paranoid.
Jayanti's film cleverly -- if controversially -- lays
out a scenario that has less to do with the advance of computer science and more
to do with a nasty mix of bruised egos and corporate arrogance run amok.Pacing
of each game builds to an intense pulse as Kasparov first wins, and then is so
soundly defeated in game two that it seems to weaken him psychologically. As
Kasparov views it, Deep Blue's winning moves transcended a machine's limits,
raising the specter of human intervention. The pic runs with the accusation,
spicing it with visuals of other famous chess-playing "machines" that turned out
to be fronts for human players.
Though no proof of the charges is uncovered (and
Benjamin, Campbell and Feng are mum on the subject), others, such as reporter
Jeff Kisselhof, suggest IBM wanted to defeat Kasparov at all costs as means to
prove company's computer supremacy. Pic notes more than once that IBM stock shot
up 15% immediately after Kasparov retired from the match.
Coda plays an unsettling note, as IBM is seen
dismantling Deep Blue after its victory, as if it existed solely to demoralize
the champ, and Kasparov stumbles through a horrific defeat to his old nemesis,
Karpov.
Production package, highlighted by David Hill's
hands-around-the-throat editing pace and Rob Lane's tense synth score, pushes
pic into the docu field's commercial penthouse.
Camera (Duart color, DV-to-35mm), Maryse Alberti; editor,
David Hill; music, Rob Lane; sound (Dolby Digital). Reviewed at Toronto Film
Festival (Real to Reel), Sept. 5, 2003. Running time: 87 MIN.

|